THE GROSS ILLEGALITY AND MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE ON THE BAKASSI ISSUE AND RULING
All United Nations Declarations forbid the illegal acquisition of territory. This means that no territory can be accepted as belonging to a country unless it was acquired through internationally recognized norms. The African Union’s Constitutive Act in Article 4(c) (to which la République du Cameroun has acceded) also entrenches the principle of the immutability of frontiers that were acquired at independence. Article 102 (1) of the UN Charter obliges all UN members to deposit any treaties into which they enter, at the secretariat of the United Nations, as soon as possible; and Article 102(2) bars any member of the UN from invoking any treaty to its aid that does not conform to the provisions of Article 102(1).
La République du Cameroun achieved its independence on January 1 1960 within a clearly defined frontier which does not include the Southern Cameroons; that frontier being to the East of the River Mungo which marks the international boundary, as per the 1931 Anglo-French border Treaty, between la République du Cameroun and Southern Cameroons. All maps presented in the Bakassi case between la République du Cameroun and Nigeria show the disputed Bakassi peninsular to be located indisputably within the territory of the Southern Cameroons. The question is this: By what Treaty, international legal instrument or UN Resolution, has the boundary of la République du Cameroun been purportedly recognized, within the United Nations system, as having moved from what it was at the attainment of its independence on January 1 1960, to Bakassi?


